English Junior Futsal Club

English Junior Futsal Club

     English junior futsal club yang lebih sering di kenal dengan sebutan EJ, adalah sebuah club futsal yang pada awalnya di bentuk atas dasar kesamaan hobby. EJ pertama kali di bentuk oleh mahasiswa pendidikan bahasa Inggris IAIN Palangkaraya angkatan 2016 yang pada mulanya hanya sebagai tim untuk mencari teman menyalurkan hobby futsal, kegiatan rutin yang di lakukan tentunya sparing melawan tim tim lain dari jurusan dan fakultas yang berbeda beda. Seiring berjalanya waktu kemistri dan kekompakan antar pemain mulai terbentuk dan terjalin, pada awal pembentukan tim ini hanya beranggotakan Ian Imana ( Kiper ), Ahmad Yani (Anchor), Novi Pahliansyah ( Flank ), Roniy Yanggara ( Flank ) dan Haris J.M ( Pivot ). Reputasi English Junior semakin meningkat ketika sering menang dalam sparing melawan tim tim internal kampus lainya dan EJ pun berubah dari mulanya hanya sebuah tim untuk mencari kesenangan menjadi sebuah tim yang cukup di segani di antara tim internal kampus lainya.

     Pada pertengahan tahun 2017 pada tepatnya saat penerimaan mahasiswa baru, English junior menyebarkan pamflet ( melalui Media Sosial ) yang berisi ajakan bergabung terbuka kepada mahasiswa pendidikan bahasa Inggris IAIN Palangkaraya angkatan 2017, pada penerimaan tersebut masuklah nama nama baru dari mahasiswa angkatan 2017 seperti, M Hasir ( Anchor ), Tirta Yoga ( Flank ), dan Jenuri ( Pivot ). Pada saat launching jersey perdana EJ mendapatkan sponsor dari YUDHATAMA Sumber Gula, PT. Lunuk Ramba Permai, serta Iwak Speed yang memberikan kontribusi dalam finansial tim yang sekarang di menejeri oleh Dimas Triyudhanto. Kompetisi pertama yang di ikuti English Junior ialah Brotherhood cup 2017 yang di adakan pada akhir Desember 2017 yang dimana EJ dapat menuai hasil yang cukup memuaskan yaitu mendapat juara ke-2, tak sampai di situ ada beberapa pemain EJ yang juga masuk dalam seleksi timnas futsal IAIN Palangkaraya, yaitu kiper dan anchor ( Ian dan Hasir ). Baru baru ini EJ juga mengikuti kompetisi Dekan Syariah Cup yang dimana juga mendapat hasil yang cukup memuaskan yaitu mampu mendapat juara ke -3. Tidak menutup kemungkinan jika pada penerimaan mahasiswa baru angkatan 2018  ini English Junior juga akan melakukan penerimaan pemain baru, agar tim semakin maju dan berkembang kedepanya.

Read More

Outline And Argumentative Essay About Playing Video Games #2

Outline

· Introduction
Thesis statement : Nevertheless, the parents may take into account the following arguments for and against playing violent video games, when they try to come up with a right decision.

· Body Paragraph
A. Supporting Argument 1
The supporters of violent video games advocate that playing such games allows teenagers to divert their aggression into the virtual world instead of the real one.

B. Supporting Argument 2
Moreover, the followers of this theory also believe that playing such video games helps children to understand and learn to control their emotions.

C. Opposing Argument 1
The opponents of violent video games are not convinced by these arguments and claim that such games have a strong negative effect on the developing minds of children and teenagers.

D. Opposing Argument 2
People who advocate against children playing violent video games argue that such games lead to violence in real life.

· Conclusion

Should children be allowed to play violent video games?

      Almost all children like to play video games. At times, parents can be shocked from all the violence and aggression they suddenly see in the video games. Some people say that these are only games and there is nothing to worry about. However, others argue that such violence is harmful for the developing personality of a young person. The question is, what should the parents do when they see their child playing such game? Should they regard it as a temporary interest and let it be, or should they forbid the game? It is a controversial subject with no definite answer. Nevertheless, the parents may take into account the following arguments for and against playing violent video games, when they try to come up with a right decision.

     The supporters of violent video games advocate that playing such games allows teenagers to divert their aggression into the virtual world instead of the real one. Teenage is a complicated period for most of the children, when their bodies and minds undergo a lot of changes. At this time they often find themselves in the conflict with the surrounding world and experience a lot of negative emotions. Playing video games with violent pretext, gives them a chance to let out the steam. It serves as an outlet for their negativity, so afterwards they could return to reality with more peaceful mindset.

     Moreover, the followers of this theory also believe that playing such video games helps children to understand and learn to control their emotions. The children, when faced with problems and disappointments often don’t know how to react. The society puts a heavy weight of expectations on teens and often they are not able to fulfill the hopes of their parents and teachers. It leads to an array of mixed emotions and feeling that children don’t know how to deal with. When playing video games that trigger the outburst of strong emotions, children learn to recognize their own feelings. It teaches them how to understand and control powerful negative emotions. 

     Nevertheless, the opponents of violent video games are not convinced by these arguments and claim that such games have a strong negative effect on the developing minds of children and teenagers. They say that these games create even more violence and aggression. When a child constantly witnesses violence, blood and murders in the video games it leaves a certain imprint on his psyche. Such child would be more prone to aggressive actions against his siblings and friends. Moreover, the opponents state that children who play such games tend to become less social and their academic progress declines.

     In addition, people who advocate against children playing violent video games argue that such games lead to violence in real life. Children are not able to separate the virtual and real world fully. That distinction is very blurry for the undeveloped young mind. They often confuse the two concepts, thus believing that what it acceptable in virtual world would be also fine in the real one. Therefore, they carry that aggressive violent attitude into their daily lives, harming the people around themselves. And afterwards, when they have to pay for the consequences of their actions, they cannot understand what they have done wrong. Thus, the opponents strongly disapprove the use of violent video games by children as dangerous and unpredictable.

     Although, the two opposing sides of this argument would never agree to compromise, the parents of young people still must make the decision that would work the best for their children. It is true that video games are just games, however, it is a fact that they can be harmful if used thoughtlessly and without parental attention. It would be desirable to try reaching a certain balance in this matter. Games should be regarded as games, which must be playing sparingly. Moreover, the parents have to understand that instead of forbidding such video games, they must provide enough alternative, such as travelling, time outside, family board games, movies, reading, arts and sports.

Read More

Outline And Argumentative Essay About Fossil Fuels #1

Outline

· Introduction
Thesis statement : Altough some people said that fossil fuel has no bad effect for our environment, I think it stil has bad effect for our Mother Earth

· Body Paragraph
A. Opposing Argument 1
The pro’s claim that they do not find negative results from fossil fuel using.

B. Rebutal Argument 1
Their research is invalid, there are mani big city people report that their air condition is so bad, especially when the traffic jam happens.

C. Opposing Argument 2
The use of fossil fuel gives no bad effect for the environment.

D. Rebutal Argument 2
That argument ignores the fact that the use of fossil fuel involving the air pollution.

E. Opposing argument 3
Fossil fuel is safe for long term use.

F. Rebutal Argument 3
Fossil fuel emition dominates in the involving of Green House effect and Global Warming.

· Conclusion

Is the use of fossil fuels safe for our Mother Earth ?

     Fossil fuels become the main energy resource until this time, Fossil fuels include coal, petroleum, natural gas, oil shales, bitumens, tar sands, and heavy oils. All contain carbon and were formed as a result of geologic processes acting on the remains of organic matter produced by photosynthesis, a process that began in the Archean Eon (4.0 billion to 2.5 billion years ago). Most carbonaceous material occurring before the Devonian Period (419.2 million to 358.9 million years ago) was derived from algae and bacteria, whereas most carbonaceous material occurring during and after that interval was derived from plants. All fossil fuels can be burned in air or with oxygen derived from air to provide heat. This heat may be employed directly, as in the case of home furnaces, or used to produce steam to drive generators that can supply electricity. In still other cases—for example, gas turbines used in jet aircraft—the heat yielded by burning a fossil fuel serves to increase both the pressure and the temperature of the combustion products to furnish motive power. Altough some people said that fossil fuel has no bad effect for our environment, I think it stil has bad effect for our Mother Earth.

     Many institution even many people said that the use of fossil fuels is harmless and safe for our environment, but the fact is one of the main by-products of fossil fuel combustion is carbon dioxide (CO2). The ever-increasing use of fossil fuels in industry, transportation, and construction has added large amounts of CO2 to Earth’s atmosphere. Atmospheric CO2 concentrations fluctuated between 275 and 290 parts per million by volume (ppmv) of dry air between 1000 CE and the late 18th century but increased to 316 ppmv by 1959 and rose to 412 ppmv in 2018. CO2 behaves as a greenhouse gas—that is, it absorbs infrared radiation (net heat energy) emitted from Earth’s surface and reradiates it back to the surface. Thus, the substantial CO2 increase in the atmosphere is a major contributing factor to human-induced global warming. Methane (CH4), another potent greenhouse gas, is the chief constituent of natural gas, and CH4 concentrations in Earth’s atmosphere rose from 722 parts per billion (ppb) before 1750 to 1,859 ppb by 2018. To counter worries over rising greenhouse gas concentrations and to diversify their energy mix, many countries have sought to reduce their dependence on fossil fuels by developing sources of renewable energy (such as wind, solar, hydroelectric, tidal, geothermal, and biofuels) while at the same time increasing the mechanical efficiency of engines and other technologies that rely on fossil fuels. Some Canadian and American who live in big cities repported that their air condition is getting worse especially during the traffic jam, there are thousand vehicles gathering in one place and emmiting the CO and CO2 to the air.

     The pro’s said that the use of fossil fuel gives no bad effect for the environment, it actually ignores the fact that The burning of fossil fuels leads to release of harmful products into the environment.  An increase in the consumption of fuel leads to harmful effects on the environment. Following points will clearly depict many bad effects. Carbon fuels such as wood, coal, petroleum release unburnt carbon particles in the environment. These particles are very dangerous pollutants and cause respiratory diseases for example asthma. When fuels are incompletely burnt, they release carbon monoxide gas into the atmosphere. This gas is very dangerous as it is poisonous in nature. If we burn coal in a closed room, then the person sleeping in that room will be killed by the action of carbon monoxide. The combustion of fossil fuels also releases a large amount of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. Carbon dioxide is a greenhouse gas which is responsible for global warming. Global warming is a rise in the overall temperature of earth’s surface. This leads to melting of polar caps and rise in the sea level and further results in flooding of coastal regions. Burning of coal and diesel releases sulphur dioxide gas. This gas is extremely corrosive and suffocating in nature. Petrol gives off oxides of nitrogen. The oxides of sulfur and nitrogen get dissolved in rainwater and form acids. This is known as acid rain. This water is very harmful to plants, animals, and various monuments.

     People who stand on pro side claim that the use of fossil fuels is safe for long term use, but unfortunately Most climate scientists agree the main cause of the current global warming trend is human expansion of the "greenhouse effect"1 — warming that results when the atmosphere traps heat radiating from Earth toward space. Certain gases in the atmosphere block heat from escaping. Long-lived gases that remain semi-permanently in the atmosphere and do not respond physically or chemically to changes in temperature are described as "forcing" climate change. Gases, such as water vapor, which respond physically or chemically to changes in temperature are seen as "feedbacks."Gases that contribute to the greenhouse effect , water vapor, The most abundant greenhouse gas, but importantly, it acts as a feedback to the climate. Water vapor increases as the Earth's atmosphere warms, but so does the possibility of clouds and precipitation, making these some of the most important feedback mechanisms to the greenhouse effect. Carbon dioxide (CO2). A minor but very important component of the atmosphere, carbon dioxide is released through natural processes such as respiration and volcano eruptions and through human activities such as deforestation, land use changes, and burning fossil fuels. Humans have increased atmospheric CO2 concentration by more than a third since the Industrial Revolution began. This is the most important long-lived "forcing" of climate change. Methane. A hydrocarbon gas produced both through natural sources and human activities, including the decomposition of wastes in landfills, agriculture, and especially rice cultivation, as well as ruminant digestion and manure management associated with domestic livestock. On a molecule-for-molecule basis, methane is a far more active greenhouse gas than carbon dioxide, but also one which is much less abundant in the atmosphere. Nitrous oxide. A powerful greenhouse gas produced by soil cultivation practices, especially the use of commercial and organic fertilizers, fossil fuel combustion, nitric acid production, and biomass burning. Chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs). Synthetic compounds entirely of industrial origin used in a number of applications, but now largely regulated in production and release to the atmosphere by international agreement for their ability to contribute to destruction of the ozone layer. They are also greenhouse gases.

     Finally, the use of fossil fuel helps us a lot to generate our life, the worldwide life but according to thoso fact above, the use of fossil fuel needs to be limmited or even the government should replace it with the renewable energy  resources including wind, solar energy and water stream energy, so the bad effect that will emphasize from the use of fossil fuel can be avoid.

Read More